|
Q. An individual has posted a message
on an Internet message board that said AMSOIL motor oils "lack sufficient
EP additives" and the "quality of the product has dropped" in
the last few years. Due to lack of EP additives and the the drop in
product quality he "wiped out bearings, pistons, rocker bushings,
etc."
A. No truth whatsoever. AMSOIL INC. has
continually improved the performance of its products over the years. The best
performing oil we've ever made are the oils we make today. In addition, new
technology has allowed us to improve performance as the introduction of our
Series 2000 oils demonstrated. Our standard products outperform the competition
and the Series 2000 products blow them away.
First of all, extreme
pressure (EP) additives are not typically used in motor oil. EP additives are
used in gear lubes and some greases. This is because they contain sulfur or
chlorine compounds that become active under engine operating conditions. In
this activated state they react with the water found in by-products of
combustion, and form acids which are corrosive to engine components such as
bearings.
Engine oils typically use
antiwear (AW) additives to prevent metal-to-metal contact within an engine.
These are commonly zinc and phosphorus compounds (zinc dithiophosphate or ZDP).
These additives are different from EP additives because they activate or bond
with metal surfaces at lower temperatures and pressures and do not form
corrosive acids. EP additives are intended to withstand higher pressures and
temperatures than found in engines. AW additives offer more than enough
protection for all engine conditions without any of the harmful side effects of
EP additives.
AMSOIL INC. has always used
higher quality and a higher level of additives including zinc and phosphorus
than most motor oils on the market. The attached tables compare the content of
zinc and phosphorus of several popular motor oils for passenger car and racing
applications. These additive contents were determined using spectrographic analysis.
Results could be verified for accuracy by submitting unused oil for analysis to
any independent oil analysis laboratory.
|
ANTI-WEAR ADDITIVES
SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS: Passenger Car Motor Oils
|
|
|
Zinc (ppm)
|
Phosphorus (ppm)
|
|
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic 0W-30
|
1599
|
1288
|
|
Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic 5W-30
|
1070
|
892
|
|
Phillips 66 Trop Artic 10W-30
|
922
|
784
|
|
Pennzoil 5W-30
|
1170
|
905
|
|
Quaker
State
10W-30 4X4 Synthetic Blend
|
1078
|
856
|
|
Castrol Syntec 5W-50
|
972
|
856
|
|
ANTI-WEAR ADDITIVES
SPECTROGRAPHIC ANALYSIS: Racing Oils
|
|
|
Zinc (ppm)
|
Phosphorus (ppm)
|
|
AMSOIL Series 2000 Synthetic 20W-50
Racing Oil
|
1675
|
1380
|
|
Mobil 1 Tri-Synthetic 15W-50
|
1500
|
1174
|
|
Quaker
State
High Perf. Synthetic Blend 15W-50
|
1030
|
960
|
|
Havoline Formula 3 20W-50
|
1085
|
834
|
|
Castrol Syntec 5W-50
|
972
|
856
|
|
Valvoline
Racing 20W-50
|
1192
|
1077
|
Quantity of AW additives
alone, however, will not make one lubricant perform better than a competitive
lubricant. It's the combination of blended synthetic basestocks with a
perfectly balanced package of the highest quality additives that allows AMSOIL
to consistently outperform the competition in all aspects, including wear
protection.(NOTE: Perfectly balanced means that using an aftermarket oil
additive will not improve and may actually harm the performance of AMSOIL motor
oils.)
The following results from
Four Ball Wear Tests will demonstrate how effective AMSOIL Synthetic Motor Oils
are at wear protection compared to other popular oils. The Four Ball Wear Test
is a lubricant industry standard (ASTM D 4172) test that compares relative wear
prevention characteristics of new lubricants at specified conditions.
AMSOIL products clearly
offer better wear protection than competitive synthetics and much better
protection than conventional oils. Engines can fail due to mechanical problems
even when using AMSOIL. AMSOIL Motor Oils, however, in over twenty-five years
have never caused an engine failure. If you ever hear someone say AMSOIL caused
their engine, bearings, pistons, etc. to fail, they are wrong.
Federal Mogul Corporation,
a manufacturer of engine bearings, pistons, connecting rods and other engine
parts, studied over 7,000 case histories of bearing distress and engine failure
and never found engine oil to be the cause of a failure. Dirt, the number one
cause of engine failure, was found to be responsible for 43.4% of failures, and
insufficient lubrication, the second most common cause of failure, was
responsible for 16.6% of failures. Insufficient lubrication is the general term
used when not enough oil gets through to the engine to lubricate it (lack of
oil volume).
Some causes of insufficient
lubrication include oxidation, oil thickening, sludge, cold temperature related
dry starts, etc. These, however, are also areas where AMSOIL motor oils out
perform the competition. If an engine breaks down with AMSOIL motor oil in it,
it would have broken down sooner using another oil! That's fact!
Back To Frequently Asked Questions |